Australia vs Ecuador: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil
Australia
917.9 current US$
in 2020
Ecuador
1,271 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
17th
Ecuador rank
14th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil over time
- Australia
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 1,271 current US$ against 917.9 current US$ in Australia, a difference of 353.1 current US$.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.4 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Ecuador ahead.
Australia ranks 17th and Ecuador ranks 14th of 86 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 935.34 current US$ | 1,360 current US$ | 424.9 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 2,787 current US$ | 4,969 current US$ | 2,182 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 3,343 current US$ | 5,180 current US$ | 1,837 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 917.9 current US$ | 1,271 current US$ | 353.4 current US$ | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil, Australia or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 1,271 current US$ against 917.9 current US$ in Australia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil between Australia and Ecuador?
- 353.1 current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Ecuador?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Ecuador rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil?
- Australia ranks 17th and Ecuador ranks 14th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.