China vs Denmark: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas

China
168.99 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Denmark
228.58 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
China rank
31st
Denmark rank
28th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas over time

  • China
  • Denmark
02505007501.0k1.2k199520072020

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 228.58 real chained 2019 US$ against 168.99 real chained 2019 US$ in China, a difference of 59.59 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.4 times China's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

China ranks 31st and Denmark ranks 28th of 148 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Denmark Difference Ahead
1990s 31.38 real chained 2019 US$ 1,092 real chained 2019 US$ 1,061 real chained 2019 US$ Denmark
2000s 39.04 real chained 2019 US$ 964.67 real chained 2019 US$ 925.63 real chained 2019 US$ Denmark
2010s 96.03 real chained 2019 US$ 278.6 real chained 2019 US$ 182.57 real chained 2019 US$ Denmark
2020s 168.99 real chained 2019 US$ 228.58 real chained 2019 US$ 59.59 real chained 2019 US$ Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas, China or Denmark?
Denmark, at 228.58 real chained 2019 US$ against 168.99 real chained 2019 US$ in China as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas between China and Denmark?
59.59 real chained 2019 US$, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Denmark?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do China and Denmark rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas?
China ranks 31st and Denmark ranks 28th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Denmark: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-natural-gas-real-chained-2019-us/china/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-natural-gas-real-chained-2019-us/china/denmark/">China vs Denmark: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.