Belarus vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas

Belarus
12.16 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mexico
15.37 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
59th
Mexico rank
58th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas over time

  • Belarus
  • Mexico
050100150200250199520072020

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 15.37 real chained 2019 US$ against 12.16 real chained 2019 US$ in Belarus, a difference of 3.21 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.3 times Belarus's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 59th and Mexico ranks 58th of 148 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Mexico Difference Ahead
1990s 11.28 real chained 2019 US$ 165.93 real chained 2019 US$ 154.65 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2000s 11.75 real chained 2019 US$ 49.11 real chained 2019 US$ 37.36 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2010s 12.07 real chained 2019 US$ 24.94 real chained 2019 US$ 12.87 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2020s 12.16 real chained 2019 US$ 15.37 real chained 2019 US$ 3.2 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas, Belarus or Mexico?
Mexico, at 15.37 real chained 2019 US$ against 12.16 real chained 2019 US$ in Belarus as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas between Belarus and Mexico?
3.21 real chained 2019 US$, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Mexico?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belarus and Mexico rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas?
Belarus ranks 59th and Mexico ranks 58th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-natural-gas-real-chained-2019-us/belarus/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-natural-gas-real-chained-2019-us/belarus/mexico/">Belarus vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.