Slovenia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas
Slovenia
0.4953 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
0.1256 current US$
in 2020
Slovenia rank
52nd
Suriname rank
55th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas over time
- Slovenia
- Suriname
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0.4953 current US$ against 0.1256 current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 0.3697 current US$.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 3.9 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Suriname ahead.
Slovenia ranks 52nd and Suriname ranks 55th of 83 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.16 current US$ | 5.61 current US$ | 4.45 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2010s | 2.57 current US$ | 6.58 current US$ | 4.01 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2020s | 0.4953 current US$ | 0.1256 current US$ | 0.3697 current US$ | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas, Slovenia or Suriname?
- Slovenia, at 0.4953 current US$ against 0.1256 current US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas between Slovenia and Suriname?
- 0.3697 current US$, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Suriname?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
- How do Slovenia and Suriname rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas?
- Slovenia ranks 52nd and Suriname ranks 55th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.