Philippines vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas
Philippines
49.53 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
81.14 current US$
in 2020
Philippines rank
32nd
Serbia rank
30th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas over time
- Philippines
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 81.14 current US$ against 49.53 current US$ in Philippines, a difference of 31.61 current US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.6 times Philippines's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 30th of 83 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.35 current US$ | 141.73 current US$ | 72.38 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 63.99 current US$ | 253.45 current US$ | 189.45 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 49.53 current US$ | 81.14 current US$ | 31.61 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas, Philippines or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 81.14 current US$ against 49.53 current US$ in Philippines as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas between Philippines and Serbia?
- 31.61 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Philippines and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas?
- Philippines ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 30th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.