Ecuador vs Romania: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas
Ecuador
0 current US$
in 2020
Romania
0 current US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
59th
Romania rank
59th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas over time
- Ecuador
- Romania
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Romania, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Romania ahead.
Ecuador ranks 59th and Romania ranks 59th of 83 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 3.52 current US$ | 3.52 current US$ | Romania |
| 2000s | 0.538 current US$ | 147.28 current US$ | 146.74 current US$ | Romania |
| 2010s | 8.81 current US$ | 119.51 current US$ | 110.71 current US$ | Romania |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas, Ecuador or Romania?
- Ecuador, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Romania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas between Ecuador and Romania?
- 0 current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Romania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Romania rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas?
- Ecuador ranks 59th and Romania ranks 59th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.