Cameroon vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas
Cameroon
101.3 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
81.14 current US$
in 2020
Cameroon rank
28th
Serbia rank
30th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas over time
- Cameroon
- Serbia
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 101.3 current US$ against 81.14 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 20.16 current US$.
That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Cameroon ranks 28th and Serbia ranks 30th of 83 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.31 current US$ | 141.73 current US$ | 139.42 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 49.93 current US$ | 253.45 current US$ | 203.51 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 101.3 current US$ | 81.14 current US$ | 20.17 current US$ | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas, Cameroon or Serbia?
- Cameroon, at 101.3 current US$ against 81.14 current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas between Cameroon and Serbia?
- 20.16 current US$, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Cameroon and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas?
- Cameroon ranks 28th and Serbia ranks 30th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, natural gas (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.