Namibia vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc

Namibia
358.12 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sweden
382.42 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia rank
5th
Sweden rank
3rd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time

  • Namibia
  • Sweden
5001.0k1.5k2.0k199520072020

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 382.42 real chained 2019 US$ against 358.12 real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia, a difference of 24.3 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 5th and Sweden ranks 3rd of 142 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 1,993 real chained 2019 US$ 793.24 real chained 2019 US$ 1,200 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2000s 1,549 real chained 2019 US$ 619.22 real chained 2019 US$ 929.34 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2010s 723 real chained 2019 US$ 398.46 real chained 2019 US$ 324.54 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2020s 358.12 real chained 2019 US$ 382.42 real chained 2019 US$ 24.3 real chained 2019 US$ Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Namibia or Sweden?
Sweden, at 382.42 real chained 2019 US$ against 358.12 real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Namibia and Sweden?
24.3 real chained 2019 US$, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sweden?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Namibia and Sweden rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
Namibia ranks 5th and Sweden ranks 3rd of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc. Statizoid. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-zinc-real-chained-2019-us/namibia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-zinc-real-chained-2019-us/namibia/sweden/">Namibia vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
142 places, 3,668 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed