Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Burkina Faso: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc

Bosnia and Herzegovina
44.52 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Burkina Faso
43.57 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
16th
Burkina Faso rank
17th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Burkina Faso
406080100120199520072020

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 44.52 real chained 2019 US$ against 43.57 real chained 2019 US$ in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.95 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 16th and Burkina Faso ranks 17th of 142 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Burkina Faso in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Burkina Faso Difference Ahead
1990s 57.51 real chained 2019 US$ 121.88 real chained 2019 US$ 64.37 real chained 2019 US$ Burkina Faso
2000s 55.26 real chained 2019 US$ 97.76 real chained 2019 US$ 42.49 real chained 2019 US$ Burkina Faso
2010s 52.62 real chained 2019 US$ 67.71 real chained 2019 US$ 15.09 real chained 2019 US$ Burkina Faso
2020s 44.52 real chained 2019 US$ 43.57 real chained 2019 US$ 0.9557 real chained 2019 US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Burkina Faso?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 44.52 real chained 2019 US$ against 43.57 real chained 2019 US$ in Burkina Faso as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Burkina Faso?
0.95 real chained 2019 US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Burkina Faso?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Burkina Faso rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 16th and Burkina Faso ranks 17th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Burkina Faso: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc. Statizoid. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-zinc-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/burkina-faso/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-zinc-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/burkina-faso/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Burkina Faso: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
142 places, 3,668 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed