Serbia vs Tunisia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc
Serbia
12.68 current US$
in 2020
Tunisia
9.95 current US$
in 2014
Serbia rank
31st
Tunisia rank
33rd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Serbia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 12.68 current US$ against 9.95 current US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 2.73 current US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 31st and Tunisia ranks 33rd of 53 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.54 current US$ | 0.4763 current US$ | 2.06 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 9.17 current US$ | 6.63 current US$ | 2.54 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Serbia or Tunisia?
- Serbia, at 12.68 current US$ against 9.95 current US$ in Tunisia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Serbia and Tunisia?
- 2.73 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Tunisia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Serbia and Tunisia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Serbia ranks 31st and Tunisia ranks 33rd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.