Saudi Arabia vs Tunisia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc
Saudi Arabia
10.11 current US$
in 2020
Tunisia
9.95 current US$
in 2014
Saudi Arabia rank
32nd
Tunisia rank
33rd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 10.11 current US$ against 9.95 current US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 0.16 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Tunisia ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 32nd and Tunisia ranks 33rd of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.47 current US$ | 10.86 current US$ | 9.39 current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 1.55 current US$ | 5.96 current US$ | 4.41 current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 8.41 current US$ | 6.63 current US$ | 1.78 current US$ | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Saudi Arabia or Tunisia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 10.11 current US$ against 9.95 current US$ in Tunisia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Saudi Arabia and Tunisia?
- 0.16 current US$, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Tunisia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2014.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Tunisia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 32nd and Tunisia ranks 33rd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.