Portugal vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc
Portugal
227.43 current US$
in 2020
Sweden
299.12 current US$
in 2020
Portugal rank
7th
Sweden rank
6th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Portugal
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 299.12 current US$ against 227.43 current US$ in Portugal, a difference of 71.69 current US$.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.3 times Portugal's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Portugal ranks 7th and Sweden ranks 6th of 53 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.2 current US$ | 527.62 current US$ | 470.42 current US$ | Sweden |
| 2010s | 108.54 current US$ | 315.31 current US$ | 206.76 current US$ | Sweden |
| 2020s | 227.43 current US$ | 299.12 current US$ | 71.69 current US$ | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Portugal or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 299.12 current US$ against 227.43 current US$ in Portugal as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Portugal and Sweden?
- 71.69 current US$, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Sweden?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Portugal and Sweden rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Portugal ranks 7th and Sweden ranks 6th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.