Poland vs Tunisia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc
Poland
14.18 current US$
in 2020
Tunisia
9.95 current US$
in 2014
Poland rank
30th
Tunisia rank
33rd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Poland
- Tunisia
How they compare
Poland currently reports 14.18 current US$ against 9.95 current US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 4.23 current US$.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.4 times Tunisia's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 30th and Tunisia ranks 33rd of 53 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24.59 current US$ | 13.51 current US$ | 11.09 current US$ | Poland |
| 2000s | 18.99 current US$ | 6.27 current US$ | 12.72 current US$ | Poland |
| 2010s | 18.97 current US$ | 6.63 current US$ | 12.33 current US$ | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Poland or Tunisia?
- Poland, at 14.18 current US$ against 9.95 current US$ in Tunisia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Poland and Tunisia?
- 4.23 current US$, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Tunisia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2014.
- How do Poland and Tunisia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Poland ranks 30th and Tunisia ranks 33rd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.