Pakistan vs Philippines: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc
Pakistan
2.24 current US$
in 2020
Philippines
2.45 current US$
in 2013
Pakistan rank
41st
Philippines rank
40th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Pakistan
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 2.45 current US$ against 2.24 current US$ in Pakistan, a difference of 0.21 current US$.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Pakistan ranks 41st and Philippines ranks 40th of 53 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1631 current US$ | 2.24 current US$ | 2.07 current US$ | Philippines |
| 2010s | 1.88 current US$ | 2.98 current US$ | 1.09 current US$ | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Pakistan or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 2.45 current US$ against 2.24 current US$ in Pakistan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Pakistan and Philippines?
- 0.21 current US$, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Philippines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Pakistan and Philippines rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Pakistan ranks 41st and Philippines ranks 40th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.