Namibia vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc
Namibia
310.77 current US$
in 2020
Sweden
299.12 current US$
in 2020
Namibia rank
5th
Sweden rank
6th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Namibia
- Sweden
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 310.77 current US$ against 299.12 current US$ in Sweden, a difference of 11.65 current US$.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sweden ahead.
Namibia ranks 5th and Sweden ranks 6th of 53 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 289.89 current US$ | 200.95 current US$ | 88.94 current US$ | Namibia |
| 2000s | 584.54 current US$ | 314.12 current US$ | 270.42 current US$ | Namibia |
| 2010s | 444.54 current US$ | 315.31 current US$ | 129.23 current US$ | Namibia |
| 2020s | 310.77 current US$ | 299.12 current US$ | 11.65 current US$ | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Namibia or Sweden?
- Namibia, at 310.77 current US$ against 299.12 current US$ in Sweden as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Namibia and Sweden?
- 11.65 current US$, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sweden?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Namibia and Sweden rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Namibia ranks 5th and Sweden ranks 6th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.