Mexico vs Tajikistan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc
Mexico
97.75 current US$
in 2020
Tajikistan
62.85 current US$
in 2020
Mexico rank
12th
Tajikistan rank
13th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Mexico
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 97.75 current US$ against 62.85 current US$ in Tajikistan, a difference of 34.9 current US$.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.6 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 12th and Tajikistan ranks 13th of 53 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 84.81 current US$ | 69.93 current US$ | 14.88 current US$ | Mexico |
| 2020s | 97.75 current US$ | 62.85 current US$ | 34.9 current US$ | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Mexico or Tajikistan?
- Mexico, at 97.75 current US$ against 62.85 current US$ in Tajikistan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Mexico and Tajikistan?
- 34.9 current US$, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Tajikistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Mexico and Tajikistan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Mexico ranks 12th and Tajikistan ranks 13th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.