Laos vs Philippines: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc
Laos
3.32 current US$
in 2013
Philippines
2.45 current US$
in 2013
Laos rank
37th
Philippines rank
40th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Laos
- Philippines
How they compare
Laos currently reports 3.32 current US$ against 2.45 current US$ in Philippines, a difference of 0.87 current US$.
That makes Laos's figure about 1.4 times Philippines's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Laos has been ahead every year.
Laos ranks 37th and Philippines ranks 40th of 53 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.66 current US$ | 1.99 current US$ | 5.67 current US$ | Laos |
| 2010s | 4.28 current US$ | 2.98 current US$ | 1.31 current US$ | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Laos or Philippines?
- Laos, at 3.32 current US$ against 2.45 current US$ in Philippines as of 2013.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Laos and Philippines?
- 0.87 current US$, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Philippines?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Laos and Philippines rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Laos ranks 37th and Philippines ranks 40th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.