Finland vs Tunisia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc
Finland
4.39 current US$
in 2020
Tunisia
9.95 current US$
in 2014
Finland rank
36th
Tunisia rank
33rd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Finland
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 9.95 current US$ against 4.39 current US$ in Finland, a difference of 5.56 current US$.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 2.3 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 36th and Tunisia ranks 33rd of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.39 current US$ | 13.51 current US$ | 3.89 current US$ | Finland |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 6.27 current US$ | 6.27 current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 104.61 current US$ | 6.63 current US$ | 97.98 current US$ | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Finland or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 9.95 current US$ against 4.39 current US$ in Finland as of 2014.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Finland and Tunisia?
- 5.56 current US$, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Tunisia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2014.
- How do Finland and Tunisia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Finland ranks 36th and Tunisia ranks 33rd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.