Ecuador vs Thailand: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc
Ecuador
0.0391 current US$
in 2001
Thailand
0.0826 current US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
53rd
Thailand rank
52nd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Ecuador
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 0.0826 current US$ against 0.0391 current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0435 current US$.
That makes Thailand's figure about 2.1 times Ecuador's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 53rd and Thailand ranks 52nd of 53 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0741 current US$ | 3.78 current US$ | 3.71 current US$ | Thailand |
| 2000s | 0.0505 current US$ | 2.85 current US$ | 2.8 current US$ | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Ecuador or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 0.0826 current US$ against 0.0391 current US$ in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Ecuador and Thailand?
- 0.0435 current US$, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Thailand?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2001.
- How do Ecuador and Thailand rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Ecuador ranks 53rd and Thailand ranks 52nd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.