Ecuador vs Romania: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc
Ecuador
0.0391 current US$
in 2001
Romania
0.5554 current US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
53rd
Romania rank
50th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Ecuador
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0.5554 current US$ against 0.0391 current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 0.5163 current US$.
That makes Romania's figure about 14.2 times Ecuador's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 53rd and Romania ranks 50th of 53 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0741 current US$ | 4.7 current US$ | 4.63 current US$ | Romania |
| 2000s | 0.0505 current US$ | 3.52 current US$ | 3.47 current US$ | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Ecuador or Romania?
- Romania, at 0.5554 current US$ against 0.0391 current US$ in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Ecuador and Romania?
- 0.5163 current US$, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Romania?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2001.
- How do Ecuador and Romania rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Ecuador ranks 53rd and Romania ranks 50th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.