China vs Tajikistan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc
China
44.57 current US$
in 2020
Tajikistan
62.85 current US$
in 2020
China rank
16th
Tajikistan rank
13th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- China
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 62.85 current US$ against 44.57 current US$ in China, a difference of 18.28 current US$.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.4 times China's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was China ahead.
China ranks 16th and Tajikistan ranks 13th of 53 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 40.37 current US$ | 69.93 current US$ | 29.56 current US$ | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 44.57 current US$ | 62.85 current US$ | 18.28 current US$ | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, China or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 62.85 current US$ against 44.57 current US$ in China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between China and Tajikistan?
- 18.28 current US$, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Tajikistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do China and Tajikistan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
- China ranks 16th and Tajikistan ranks 13th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.