Chile vs Spain: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc
Chile
15.74 current US$
in 2020
Spain
15.76 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
28th
Spain rank
27th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Chile
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 15.76 current US$ against 15.74 current US$ in Chile, a difference of 0.02 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Spain ahead.
Chile ranks 28th and Spain ranks 27th of 53 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Spain in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.91 current US$ | 21.71 current US$ | 5.8 current US$ | Spain |
| 2000s | 11.84 current US$ | 13.08 current US$ | 1.23 current US$ | Spain |
| 2010s | 18.79 current US$ | 16.62 current US$ | 2.17 current US$ | Chile |
| 2020s | 15.74 current US$ | 15.76 current US$ | 0.0214 current US$ | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Chile or Spain?
- Spain, at 15.76 current US$ against 15.74 current US$ in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Chile and Spain?
- 0.02 current US$, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Spain?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Spain rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Chile ranks 28th and Spain ranks 27th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.