Chile vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc
Chile
15.74 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
12.68 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
28th
Serbia rank
31st
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Chile
- Serbia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 15.74 current US$ against 12.68 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 3.06 current US$.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 28th and Serbia ranks 31st of 53 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.5 current US$ | 4.04 current US$ | 38.46 current US$ | Chile |
| 2010s | 18.79 current US$ | 10.27 current US$ | 8.51 current US$ | Chile |
| 2020s | 15.74 current US$ | 12.68 current US$ | 3.06 current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Chile or Serbia?
- Chile, at 15.74 current US$ against 12.68 current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Chile and Serbia?
- 3.06 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Chile ranks 28th and Serbia ranks 31st of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.