Brazil vs Tunisia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc
Brazil
8.5 current US$
in 2020
Tunisia
9.95 current US$
in 2014
Brazil rank
34th
Tunisia rank
33rd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Brazil
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 9.95 current US$ against 8.5 current US$ in Brazil, a difference of 1.45 current US$.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Tunisia ahead.
Brazil ranks 34th and Tunisia ranks 33rd of 53 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.81 current US$ | 13.51 current US$ | 7.69 current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0.2684 current US$ | 6.27 current US$ | 6 current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0.4347 current US$ | 6.63 current US$ | 6.2 current US$ | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Brazil or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 9.95 current US$ against 8.5 current US$ in Brazil as of 2014.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Brazil and Tunisia?
- 1.45 current US$, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Tunisia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2014.
- How do Brazil and Tunisia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Brazil ranks 34th and Tunisia ranks 33rd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.