Brazil vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc
Brazil
8.5 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
12.68 current US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
34th
Serbia rank
31st
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Brazil
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 12.68 current US$ against 8.5 current US$ in Brazil, a difference of 4.18 current US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.5 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 34th and Serbia ranks 31st of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.04 current US$ | 4.04 current US$ | 9 current US$ | Brazil |
| 2010s | 1.6 current US$ | 10.27 current US$ | 8.67 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 8.5 current US$ | 12.68 current US$ | 4.18 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Brazil or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 12.68 current US$ against 8.5 current US$ in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Brazil and Serbia?
- 4.18 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Brazil ranks 34th and Serbia ranks 31st of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.