Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tajikistan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc

Bosnia and Herzegovina
45.19 current US$
in 2020
Tajikistan
62.85 current US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
15th
Tajikistan rank
13th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Tajikistan
0255075100199720082020

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 62.85 current US$ against 45.19 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 17.66 current US$.

That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.4 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 15th and Tajikistan ranks 13th of 53 countries.

Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Tajikistan Difference Ahead
2010s 38.01 current US$ 69.93 current US$ 31.92 current US$ Tajikistan
2020s 45.19 current US$ 62.85 current US$ 17.66 current US$ Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Tajikistan?
Tajikistan, at 62.85 current US$ against 45.19 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tajikistan?
17.66 current US$, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tajikistan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tajikistan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 15th and Tajikistan ranks 13th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tajikistan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc. Statizoid. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-zinc-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-zinc-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/tajikistan/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tajikistan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 1,086 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed