Argentina vs Philippines: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc
Argentina
2.54 current US$
in 2020
Philippines
2.45 current US$
in 2013
Argentina rank
38th
Philippines rank
40th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Argentina
- Philippines
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 2.54 current US$ against 2.45 current US$ in Philippines, a difference of 0.09 current US$.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 38th and Philippines ranks 40th of 53 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 1.99 current US$ | 1.99 current US$ | Philippines |
| 2010s | 0.5876 current US$ | 2.98 current US$ | 2.39 current US$ | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Argentina or Philippines?
- Argentina, at 2.54 current US$ against 2.45 current US$ in Philippines as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Argentina and Philippines?
- 0.09 current US$, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Philippines?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Argentina and Philippines rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Argentina ranks 38th and Philippines ranks 40th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.