Argentina vs Guatemala: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc
Argentina
2.54 current US$
in 2020
Guatemala
2.51 current US$
in 2020
Argentina rank
38th
Guatemala rank
39th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Argentina
- Guatemala
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 2.54 current US$ against 2.51 current US$ in Guatemala, a difference of 0.03 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Guatemala ahead.
Argentina ranks 38th and Guatemala ranks 39th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 15.23 current US$ | 15.23 current US$ | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0.6061 current US$ | 4.63 current US$ | 4.03 current US$ | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 2.54 current US$ | 2.51 current US$ | 0.0332 current US$ | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc, Argentina or Guatemala?
- Argentina, at 2.54 current US$ against 2.51 current US$ in Guatemala as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc between Argentina and Guatemala?
- 0.03 current US$, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Guatemala?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Guatemala rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Argentina ranks 38th and Guatemala ranks 39th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.