China vs Malaysia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: tin
China
0 current US$
in 2020
Malaysia
0 current US$
in 2020
China rank
3rd
Malaysia rank
3rd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: tin over time
- China
- Malaysia
How they compare
China currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Malaysia, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
China ranks 3rd and Malaysia ranks 3rd of 25 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2010s | 0.4034 current US$ | 1.37 current US$ | 0.9702 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: tin, China or Malaysia?
- China, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Malaysia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: tin between China and Malaysia?
- 0 current US$, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Malaysia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do China and Malaysia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: tin?
- China ranks 3rd and Malaysia ranks 3rd of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: tin (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.