Australia vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: tin
Australia
0 current US$
in 2020
Mexico
0.0094 current US$
in 2008
Australia rank
3rd
Mexico rank
2nd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: tin over time
- Australia
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 0.0094 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Australia, a difference of 0.0094 current US$.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 3rd and Mexico ranks 2nd of 25 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 0.0017 current US$ | 0.0017 current US$ | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: tin, Australia or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 0.0094 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Australia as of 2008.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: tin between Australia and Mexico?
- 0.0094 current US$, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mexico?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2008.
- How do Australia and Mexico rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: tin?
- Australia ranks 3rd and Mexico ranks 2nd of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: tin (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.