Australia vs Laos: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: tin
Australia
0 current US$
in 2020
Laos
0 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
3rd
Laos rank
3rd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: tin over time
- Australia
- Laos
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Laos, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Laos has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 3rd and Laos ranks 3rd of 25 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 0.3596 current US$ | 0.3596 current US$ | Laos |
| 2010s | 2.15 current US$ | 4.67 current US$ | 2.52 current US$ | Laos |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: tin, Australia or Laos?
- Australia, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Laos as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: tin between Australia and Laos?
- 0 current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Laos?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Laos rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: tin?
- Australia ranks 3rd and Laos ranks 3rd of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: tin (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.