Philippines vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Philippines
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 343.91 real chained 2019 US$ against 282.11 real chained 2019 US$ in Philippines, a difference of 61.8 real chained 2019 US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Philippines's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 63rd and Serbia ranks 61st of 151 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 247.08 real chained 2019 US$ | 373 real chained 2019 US$ | 125.92 real chained 2019 US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 271.26 real chained 2019 US$ | 361.41 real chained 2019 US$ | 90.15 real chained 2019 US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 282.11 real chained 2019 US$ | 343.91 real chained 2019 US$ | 61.8 real chained 2019 US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Philippines or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 343.91 real chained 2019 US$ against 282.11 real chained 2019 US$ in Philippines as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Philippines and Serbia?
- 61.8 real chained 2019 US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Philippines and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Philippines ranks 63rd and Serbia ranks 61st of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.