Norway vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals

Norway
346.57 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
343.91 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Norway rank
60th
Serbia rank
61st

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time

  • Norway
  • Serbia
0200400600199520072020

How they compare

Norway currently reports 346.57 real chained 2019 US$ against 343.91 real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia, a difference of 2.66 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Norway ranks 60th and Serbia ranks 61st of 151 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 507.78 real chained 2019 US$ 373 real chained 2019 US$ 134.78 real chained 2019 US$ Norway
2010s 402.39 real chained 2019 US$ 361.41 real chained 2019 US$ 40.98 real chained 2019 US$ Norway
2020s 346.57 real chained 2019 US$ 343.91 real chained 2019 US$ 2.66 real chained 2019 US$ Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Norway or Serbia?
Norway, at 346.57 real chained 2019 US$ against 343.91 real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Norway and Serbia?
2.66 real chained 2019 US$, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Norway and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
Norway ranks 60th and Serbia ranks 61st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/norway/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/norway/serbia/">Norway vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.