Niger vs Romania: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals

Niger
52.68 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Romania
35.03 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Niger rank
81st
Romania rank
84th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time

  • Niger
  • Romania
50100150200250199520072020

How they compare

Niger currently reports 52.68 real chained 2019 US$ against 35.03 real chained 2019 US$ in Romania, a difference of 17.65 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Niger's figure about 1.5 times Romania's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.

Niger ranks 81st and Romania ranks 84th of 151 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Niger Romania Difference Ahead
1990s 211.86 real chained 2019 US$ 79.26 real chained 2019 US$ 132.6 real chained 2019 US$ Niger
2000s 153.6 real chained 2019 US$ 52.02 real chained 2019 US$ 101.57 real chained 2019 US$ Niger
2010s 80.03 real chained 2019 US$ 39.94 real chained 2019 US$ 40.09 real chained 2019 US$ Niger
2020s 52.68 real chained 2019 US$ 35.03 real chained 2019 US$ 17.65 real chained 2019 US$ Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Niger or Romania?
Niger, at 52.68 real chained 2019 US$ against 35.03 real chained 2019 US$ in Romania as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Niger and Romania?
17.65 real chained 2019 US$, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Romania?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Niger and Romania rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
Niger ranks 81st and Romania ranks 84th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Niger vs Romania: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/niger/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/niger/romania/">Niger vs Romania: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.