Montenegro vs Nicaragua: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals

Montenegro
517.82 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Nicaragua
551 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Montenegro rank
44th
Nicaragua rank
42nd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time

  • Montenegro
  • Nicaragua
05001.0k1.5k199520072020

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 551 real chained 2019 US$ against 517.82 real chained 2019 US$ in Montenegro, a difference of 33.18 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.

Montenegro ranks 44th and Nicaragua ranks 42nd of 151 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Nicaragua Difference Ahead
2000s 686.21 real chained 2019 US$ 981.55 real chained 2019 US$ 295.34 real chained 2019 US$ Nicaragua
2010s 619.36 real chained 2019 US$ 760.56 real chained 2019 US$ 141.2 real chained 2019 US$ Nicaragua
2020s 517.82 real chained 2019 US$ 551 real chained 2019 US$ 33.18 real chained 2019 US$ Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Montenegro or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 551 real chained 2019 US$ against 517.82 real chained 2019 US$ in Montenegro as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Montenegro and Nicaragua?
33.18 real chained 2019 US$, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Nicaragua?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Montenegro and Nicaragua rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
Montenegro ranks 44th and Nicaragua ranks 42nd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Montenegro vs Nicaragua: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/montenegro/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/montenegro/nicaragua/">Montenegro vs Nicaragua: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.