Mali vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals

Mali
952.1 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
836.43 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mali rank
30th
Zimbabwe rank
32nd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time

  • Mali
  • Zimbabwe
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199520072020

How they compare

Mali currently reports 952.1 real chained 2019 US$ against 836.43 real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 115.67 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.

Mali ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 151 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 4,229 real chained 2019 US$ 1,916 real chained 2019 US$ 2,313 real chained 2019 US$ Mali
2000s 2,937 real chained 2019 US$ 1,465 real chained 2019 US$ 1,472 real chained 2019 US$ Mali
2010s 1,524 real chained 2019 US$ 1,170 real chained 2019 US$ 354.17 real chained 2019 US$ Mali
2020s 952.1 real chained 2019 US$ 836.43 real chained 2019 US$ 115.67 real chained 2019 US$ Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Mali or Zimbabwe?
Mali, at 952.1 real chained 2019 US$ against 836.43 real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Mali and Zimbabwe?
115.67 real chained 2019 US$, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mali and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
Mali ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/mali/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/mali/zimbabwe/">Mali vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.