Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals

Kyrgyzstan
1,674 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia
1,708 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
17th
Namibia rank
15th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Namibia
2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k6.0k199520072020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 1,708 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,674 real chained 2019 US$ in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 34 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th and Namibia ranks 15th of 151 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 4,557 real chained 2019 US$ 5,115 real chained 2019 US$ 558.46 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2000s 3,537 real chained 2019 US$ 4,013 real chained 2019 US$ 476.4 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2010s 2,386 real chained 2019 US$ 2,532 real chained 2019 US$ 146.4 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2020s 1,674 real chained 2019 US$ 1,708 real chained 2019 US$ 33.44 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Kyrgyzstan or Namibia?
Namibia, at 1,708 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,674 real chained 2019 US$ in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
34 real chained 2019 US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Namibia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th and Namibia ranks 15th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/kyrgyz-republic/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/kyrgyz-republic/namibia/">Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.