Egypt vs Rwanda: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals

Egypt
83.2 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Rwanda
88.75 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Egypt rank
78th
Rwanda rank
75th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time

  • Egypt
  • Rwanda
100150200250199520072020

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 88.75 real chained 2019 US$ against 83.2 real chained 2019 US$ in Egypt, a difference of 5.55 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Egypt ranks 78th and Rwanda ranks 75th of 151 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 159.15 real chained 2019 US$ 191.64 real chained 2019 US$ 32.49 real chained 2019 US$ Rwanda
2000s 132.3 real chained 2019 US$ 151.76 real chained 2019 US$ 19.46 real chained 2019 US$ Rwanda
2010s 99.29 real chained 2019 US$ 116.15 real chained 2019 US$ 16.87 real chained 2019 US$ Rwanda
2020s 83.2 real chained 2019 US$ 88.75 real chained 2019 US$ 5.55 real chained 2019 US$ Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Egypt or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 88.75 real chained 2019 US$ against 83.2 real chained 2019 US$ in Egypt as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Egypt and Rwanda?
5.55 real chained 2019 US$, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Rwanda?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Egypt and Rwanda rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
Egypt ranks 78th and Rwanda ranks 75th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Rwanda: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/egypt-arab-rep/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/egypt-arab-rep/rwanda/">Egypt vs Rwanda: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.