China vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals

China
238.27 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
343.91 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
China rank
64th
Serbia rank
61st

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time

  • China
  • Serbia
100200300400199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 343.91 real chained 2019 US$ against 238.27 real chained 2019 US$ in China, a difference of 105.64 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.4 times China's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

China ranks 64th and Serbia ranks 61st of 151 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 191.47 real chained 2019 US$ 373 real chained 2019 US$ 181.53 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2010s 223.45 real chained 2019 US$ 361.41 real chained 2019 US$ 137.96 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2020s 238.27 real chained 2019 US$ 343.91 real chained 2019 US$ 105.64 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, China or Serbia?
Serbia, at 343.91 real chained 2019 US$ against 238.27 real chained 2019 US$ in China as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between China and Serbia?
105.64 real chained 2019 US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do China and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
China ranks 64th and Serbia ranks 61st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/china/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/china/serbia/">China vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.