Brazil vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals

Brazil
3,001 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sweden
3,594 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
11th
Sweden rank
9th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time

  • Brazil
  • Sweden
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k199520072020

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 3,594 real chained 2019 US$ against 3,001 real chained 2019 US$ in Brazil, a difference of 593 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 11th and Sweden ranks 9th of 151 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 1,104 real chained 2019 US$ 9,153 real chained 2019 US$ 8,049 real chained 2019 US$ Sweden
2000s 1,764 real chained 2019 US$ 9,020 real chained 2019 US$ 7,256 real chained 2019 US$ Sweden
2010s 2,589 real chained 2019 US$ 7,180 real chained 2019 US$ 4,591 real chained 2019 US$ Sweden
2020s 3,001 real chained 2019 US$ 3,594 real chained 2019 US$ 592.49 real chained 2019 US$ Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Brazil or Sweden?
Sweden, at 3,594 real chained 2019 US$ against 3,001 real chained 2019 US$ in Brazil as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Brazil and Sweden?
593 real chained 2019 US$, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sweden?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Brazil and Sweden rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
Brazil ranks 11th and Sweden ranks 9th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/brazil/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/brazil/sweden/">Brazil vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.