Azerbaijan vs Ecuador: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals

Azerbaijan
173.29 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ecuador
181.54 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Azerbaijan rank
69th
Ecuador rank
68th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Ecuador
0100200300400500199520072020

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 181.54 real chained 2019 US$ against 173.29 real chained 2019 US$ in Azerbaijan, a difference of 8.25 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan ranks 69th and Ecuador ranks 68th of 151 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 295.44 real chained 2019 US$ 459.08 real chained 2019 US$ 163.64 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2000s 275.73 real chained 2019 US$ 356.39 real chained 2019 US$ 80.66 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2010s 220.29 real chained 2019 US$ 242.04 real chained 2019 US$ 21.74 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2020s 173.29 real chained 2019 US$ 181.54 real chained 2019 US$ 8.25 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Azerbaijan or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 181.54 real chained 2019 US$ against 173.29 real chained 2019 US$ in Azerbaijan as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Azerbaijan and Ecuador?
8.25 real chained 2019 US$, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Ecuador?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Azerbaijan and Ecuador rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
Azerbaijan ranks 69th and Ecuador ranks 68th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Ecuador: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/azerbaijan/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/azerbaijan/ecuador/">Azerbaijan vs Ecuador: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.