Austria vs Sudan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals

Austria
385.86 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sudan
369.62 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Austria rank
52nd
Sudan rank
55th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time

  • Austria
  • Sudan
0200400600800199520072020

How they compare

Austria currently reports 385.86 real chained 2019 US$ against 369.62 real chained 2019 US$ in Sudan, a difference of 16.24 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.

Austria ranks 52nd and Sudan ranks 55th of 151 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 430.86 real chained 2019 US$ 644.36 real chained 2019 US$ 213.49 real chained 2019 US$ Sudan
2020s 385.86 real chained 2019 US$ 369.62 real chained 2019 US$ 16.24 real chained 2019 US$ Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Austria or Sudan?
Austria, at 385.86 real chained 2019 US$ against 369.62 real chained 2019 US$ in Sudan as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Austria and Sudan?
16.24 real chained 2019 US$, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Sudan?
9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
How do Austria and Sudan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
Austria ranks 52nd and Sudan ranks 55th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Sudan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/austria/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/austria/sudan/">Austria vs Sudan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.