Armenia vs Brazil: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals

Armenia
2,414 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Brazil
3,001 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Armenia rank
13th
Brazil rank
11th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time

  • Armenia
  • Brazil
1.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k3.0k199520072020

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 3,001 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,414 real chained 2019 US$ in Armenia, a difference of 587 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 13th and Brazil ranks 11th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 3 and Brazil in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Brazil Difference Ahead
1990s 2,308 real chained 2019 US$ 1,104 real chained 2019 US$ 1,204 real chained 2019 US$ Armenia
2000s 2,873 real chained 2019 US$ 1,764 real chained 2019 US$ 1,109 real chained 2019 US$ Armenia
2010s 2,664 real chained 2019 US$ 2,589 real chained 2019 US$ 74.7 real chained 2019 US$ Armenia
2020s 2,414 real chained 2019 US$ 3,001 real chained 2019 US$ 587.02 real chained 2019 US$ Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Armenia or Brazil?
Brazil, at 3,001 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,414 real chained 2019 US$ in Armenia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Armenia and Brazil?
587 real chained 2019 US$, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Brazil?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Armenia and Brazil rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
Armenia ranks 13th and Brazil ranks 11th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Brazil: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/armenia/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained/armenia/brazil/">Armenia vs Brazil: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.