Zambia vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Zambia
1,083 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
1,097 current US$
in 2020
Zambia rank
35th
Zimbabwe rank
34th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Zambia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1,097 current US$ against 1,083 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 14 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zambia ahead.
Zambia ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 116 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Zambia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Zambia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 253.73 current US$ | 325.92 current US$ | 72.19 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 1,335 current US$ | 119.42 current US$ | 1,216 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2010s | 2,049 current US$ | 286.48 current US$ | 1,762 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 1,083 current US$ | 1,097 current US$ | 13.49 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Zambia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1,097 current US$ against 1,083 current US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Zambia and Zimbabwe?
- 14 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Zambia and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Zambia and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Zambia ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.