Serbia vs Sudan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Serbia
463.54 current US$
in 2020
Sudan
486.62 current US$
in 2020
Serbia rank
58th
Sudan rank
55th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Serbia
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 486.62 current US$ against 463.54 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 23.08 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 58th and Sudan ranks 55th of 116 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 2 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.56 current US$ | 24.98 current US$ | 42.58 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 416.55 current US$ | 193.11 current US$ | 223.44 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 463.54 current US$ | 486.62 current US$ | 23.08 current US$ | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Serbia or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 486.62 current US$ against 463.54 current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Serbia and Sudan?
- 23.08 current US$, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Sudan?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Serbia and Sudan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Serbia ranks 58th and Sudan ranks 55th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.