Portugal vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Portugal
427.05 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
463.54 current US$
in 2020
Portugal rank
61st
Serbia rank
58th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Portugal
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 463.54 current US$ against 427.05 current US$ in Portugal, a difference of 36.49 current US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Portugal ahead.
Portugal ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 58th of 116 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 416.74 current US$ | 67.56 current US$ | 349.18 current US$ | Portugal |
| 2010s | 414.55 current US$ | 416.55 current US$ | 2 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 427.05 current US$ | 463.54 current US$ | 36.49 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Portugal or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 463.54 current US$ against 427.05 current US$ in Portugal as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Portugal and Serbia?
- 36.49 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Portugal and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Portugal ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 58th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.