Panama vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Panama
459.61 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
463.54 current US$
in 2020
Panama rank
59th
Serbia rank
58th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Panama
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 463.54 current US$ against 459.61 current US$ in Panama, a difference of 3.93 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 59th and Serbia ranks 58th of 116 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.88 current US$ | 97.66 current US$ | 35.78 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 103.03 current US$ | 416.55 current US$ | 313.52 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 459.61 current US$ | 463.54 current US$ | 3.92 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Panama or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 463.54 current US$ against 459.61 current US$ in Panama as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Panama and Serbia?
- 3.93 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Panama and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Panama ranks 59th and Serbia ranks 58th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.