Oman vs Sri Lanka: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Oman
0.0896 current US$
in 2017
Sri Lanka
0 current US$
in 2020
Oman rank
110th
Sri Lanka rank
111th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Oman
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Oman currently reports 0.0896 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0896 current US$.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Oman ahead.
Oman ranks 110th and Sri Lanka ranks 111th of 116 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.93 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 6.93 current US$ | Oman |
| 2000s | 2.65 current US$ | 1.66 current US$ | 0.9856 current US$ | Oman |
| 2010s | 152.99 current US$ | 2.7 current US$ | 150.29 current US$ | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Oman or Sri Lanka?
- Oman, at 0.0896 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Sri Lanka as of 2017.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Oman and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0896 current US$, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Sri Lanka?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2017.
- How do Oman and Sri Lanka rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Oman ranks 110th and Sri Lanka ranks 111th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.