Morocco vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Morocco
451.59 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
463.54 current US$
in 2020
Morocco rank
60th
Serbia rank
58th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Morocco
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 463.54 current US$ against 451.59 current US$ in Morocco, a difference of 11.95 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Morocco ahead.
Morocco ranks 60th and Serbia ranks 58th of 116 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 991.92 current US$ | 67.56 current US$ | 924.36 current US$ | Morocco |
| 2010s | 1,302 current US$ | 416.55 current US$ | 885.61 current US$ | Morocco |
| 2020s | 451.59 current US$ | 463.54 current US$ | 11.94 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Morocco or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 463.54 current US$ against 451.59 current US$ in Morocco as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Morocco and Serbia?
- 11.95 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Morocco and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Morocco ranks 60th and Serbia ranks 58th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.