Mali vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Mali
1,170 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
1,083 current US$
in 2020
Mali rank
33rd
Zambia rank
35th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Mali
- Zambia
How they compare
Mali currently reports 1,170 current US$ against 1,083 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 87 current US$.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zambia ahead.
Mali ranks 33rd and Zambia ranks 35th of 116 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 71.64 current US$ | 253.73 current US$ | 182.09 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2000s | 236.21 current US$ | 1,335 current US$ | 1,099 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2010s | 682.78 current US$ | 2,049 current US$ | 1,366 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 1,170 current US$ | 1,083 current US$ | 86.8 current US$ | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Mali or Zambia?
- Mali, at 1,170 current US$ against 1,083 current US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Mali and Zambia?
- 87 current US$, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Mali and Zambia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Mali ranks 33rd and Zambia ranks 35th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.